<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fisheye + Sphere = ?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dfunkd.com/detour/2008/01/15/fisheye-sphere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dfunkd.com/detour/2008/01/15/fisheye-sphere/</link>
	<description>Photographic distractions</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: A</title>
		<link>http://dfunkd.com/detour/2008/01/15/fisheye-sphere/#comment-16222</link>
		<dc:creator>A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 21:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dfunkd.com/detour/2008/01/15/fisheye-sphere/#comment-16222</guid>
		<description>Oh, yeah, now that you mention it a concave surface does sound more plausible. Hmmm, now if only I could find a big one of those!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, yeah, now that you mention it a concave surface does sound more plausible. Hmmm, now if only I could find a big one of those!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schmee</title>
		<link>http://dfunkd.com/detour/2008/01/15/fisheye-sphere/#comment-16221</link>
		<dc:creator>schmee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 16:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dfunkd.com/detour/2008/01/15/fisheye-sphere/#comment-16221</guid>
		<description>wouldn't a sphere just make it more fishy?  a concave mirror would cancel out the fisheye effect wouldn't it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wouldn&#8217;t a sphere just make it more fishy?  a concave mirror would cancel out the fisheye effect wouldn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
